We went to university together top sluty lolita website And, really in a much larger and more comprehensive sense, wouldn't the entirety of the constitution be teetering towards being invalid if your logic is to prevail? How could the framers, for instance, be wrong about the right to keep and bear (without our use of their gift, Article 5, to fix the error) to the point that we can simply ignore what they wrote, and yet other things, like the right to free speech using modes they never envisioned, would be appropriate? It all boils down to what you want, rather than what the law says, don't you think?